Data trust
Can demand be trusted without shelf sensors?
Existing sales activity informs demand. Observed counts and verified work correct the inventory record.
The design uses data the store already produces: point-of-sale transactions, inventory records, planograms, digital orders and delivery plans. RetailSync is designed to mark every event with its source, the time it happened and how current it is.
A predicted shelf count is an estimate, not a sensor reading. It is corrected by physical observation: when an associate completes and verifies a replenishment, or corrects a count, the shelf and backstock records update from what was actually seen. The design uses existing store data plus verified inventory counts, without requiring new shelf sensors or cameras. Optional feeds can supplement it.
Perpetual inventory records a store total, not what is on the shelf, so a product can be in stock but not on sale. RetailFlow is designed to hold salesfloor and backstock quantities separately, so both are under system control.
Shrink and theft
What about shrink and theft?
Expected-versus-observed counts can expose discrepancies for investigation.
Each verified count is compared with what the record expected. A variance is not proof of theft: it can come from a receiving error, a misplaced case, damage or a sale recorded late. Sensor-free operation does not mean every loss is detected immediately, and some loss may not be visible until a later count.
RetailFlow is not a theft-prevention system, and its labor case counts no theft benefit. Inventory distortion, fresh waste and loss are assessed separately against the retailer’s own baseline.
Supply
What if 100 are expected and only four arrive?
Each delivery is checked against the committed delivery plan. A shortfall is detected immediately, and store management and supply chain are alerted so it can be corrected.
RetailFlow has access to the forward delivery plan the distribution center or vendor is committing. If the delivery count differs from that plan, the variance is detected as part of delivery restocking, immediately, and store management and supply chain alerts are raised for correction. The shelf’s cover is recalculated from the stock that actually arrived.
Adoption
Why change from the systems we already run?
Designed to work alongside existing retailer systems without requiring their replacement. Data access, mapping, permissions and integration needs are agreed for each proof.
RetailFlow depends on data points the existing systems already expose, and works alongside those applications while returning more precise intelligence that they can use. Its use of existing system feeds is designed to need no pre-processing of data by the retailer’s internal IT teams. Near real-time visibility is why it interacts with them directly. Adoption starts with a conversation about fit and, if it fits, a bounded store proof with agreed categories, baseline, measures and milestones.
A proof still takes work on both sides: data access, product and location mapping, store processes and associate training.
In-day response
Does it respond during the day, or only overnight?
Designed for both. Overnight alignment sets the start-of-day work; during the day, sales and digital picks update the shelf picture and lead to verified work.
Overnight, counts and deliveries are reconciled and a start-of-day pick and replenishment list is prepared. During the day, sales and digital picks deplete the shelf record. For example, if shoppers take 25 of 30 units on a shelf in the morning, the record falls with each sale. When ShelfPulse predicts the facing will run out before the next delivery while backstock is available, LaborSense is designed to create a task that says what movement is needed, when it should be done and how long it should take, and that is assigned, acknowledged, completed and verified.
Picklists can be batched, digital picks are batched, and deliveries into backstock are batched by delivery as the distribution center or vendor dictates. Each batch is accounted for as it is picked; the later point-of-sale record for that order is handled separately by policy, so one purchase is not counted twice.
Labor
Does it remove a whole position?
Usable freed hours are summed weekly. At a 40-hour weekly working basis, each 40 hours of usable capacity released is equivalent to one full-time weekly position. Payroll savings depend on scheduling and an actual staffing decision.
A few minutes saved on each task does not pay for itself until those minutes add up to time a store can actually reschedule. Fragmented time may improve coverage without removing a position. Released capacity, whole 40-hour blocks, actual people and realized cash are four different things, and each needs its own evidence or decision.